Legal billing is having a moment, and it’s not because hourly invoices suddenly got more charming.

Automation and AI have fundamentally changed how legal work gets done, and clients are taking a harder look at the pricing structures they’re being offered. They want clarity, predictability, and far fewer billing surprises.

Fortunately, the legal industry isn’t standing still. Today’s firms have more billing models to choose from than ever, each with distinct strengths, tradeoffs, and best-fit scenarios. Knowing when (and why) to use them is a core business skill for modern law firms.

Why Legal Billing Is Shifting

Your clients are savvy, and they’re no longer just asking “how much?”

They’re asking why it costs what it does, where the time goes, and when technology is doing the heavy lifting. As legal work becomes increasingly tech-powered, clients expect it to be faster, more consistent, and priced accordingly.  

Industry data reflects this shift. Nearly half of respondents (46%) believe lawyers should not charge the same rates when AI is used, highlighting rising pressure to rethink traditional billing models and pricing strategies in law firms.

At the same time, firms now have clearer visibility into how work gets done. With tools like automatic time capture, matter analytics, and AI-assisted workflows, pricing decisions no longer rely on gut instinct. Combined with rising client expectations, that clarity is pushing firms to look beyond hourly billing.

That said, hourly billing still has its place. The key isn’t abandoning it altogether, it’s knowing when it makes sense. The right billing model depends on how your cases run and what best supports your firm’s operations.

The Most Common Legal Billing Models (and When to Use Them)

Hourly Billing

Best for: Complex, unpredictable matters

Hourly billing charges clients based on time spent. It remains common in litigation and advisory work where the scope can shift quickly.

Pros

• Widely used and understood model

• Flexible for evolving matters

• Can quote higher advance fees

• Ties fees directly to the work performed

Cons

• Unpredictable costs for clients

• Increasing resistance from cost-conscious clients

• High up-front costs (retainers) from clients

• Requires accurate time tracking and hours frequently go unrecorded

While the model itself is straightforward, accurate time tracking can be a real operational challenge without the right systems in place.

When it works best:
High-stakes litigation or novel legal issues where the path forward isn’t clear, like a contested commercial dispute or a family law case where new facts keep arising and timelines keep shifting.  

Is hourly billing your best option? Ask yourself:

• Is the scope likely to change as the matter unfolds?

• Is the client comfortable with variable costs?

• Can the firm accurately capture and bill all time?

• Does the complexity justify hourly pricing?

Flat Fee Billing

Best for: Clearly defined, repeatable services

Flat fees charge one price for a specific service, typically paid upfront or in set stages, no matter how many hours the work takes. Think estate planning, business formations, or uncontested matters. Many jurisdictions also now allow for what they call “unbundled legal services,” where instead of taking on an entire matter, you take on a piece of it. E.g., instead of signing on for an entire divorce case, you are retained solely to draft the Final Decree. This means you are better able to charge a flat fee for such a service.

Pros

• Predictable pricing your clients will love

• Pushes your team to work efficiently by relying on systems, not billable hours

• Adds ease to billing and collections thanks to clear scope, upfront pricing, and fewer surprises

Cons

• Can backfire if the scope isn’t tightly controlled

• No reliable historical reporting = no reliable pricing

• Not ideal for matters with changing timelines or requirements

• Isn’t profitable without proper workflows and automation in place

When it works best:
Matters with clear boundaries and repeatable workflows.

Why AI matters here:
When firms actually see how long work takes (not just how long they assume it does) flat fees get way less risky. Automatic time tracking and matter analytics provide insights to price with confidence, not guesswork.

Is flat fee billing your best option? Ask yourself:

• Is the scope clearly defined and unlikely to change?

• Do we have reliable historical data to price this accurately?

• Can the firm absorb risk if the work takes longer than expected?

• Are our processes efficient and repeatable?

Hybrid Fees

Best for: Matters with defined limits but variable complexity

Ideal when you can estimate the work, but don’t fully control how the case unfolds. Perfect for giving clients peace of mind while keeping flexibility. Think contract drafting and negotiation or commercial lease reviews that end up becoming more cumbersome than first contemplated. You essentially start off operating under a flat fee agreement, with the option of switching to hourly when certain things exceed said flat fee.  

Pros

• Gives clients a clearer picture of costs upfront

• Smooth transition away from pure hourly billing

• Keeps flexibility for tricky matters if you end up needing to jump from a flat fee to hourly

Cons

• Still revolves around internal time tracking, an operational pain

• Margins can shrink if not managed carefully

When it works best:
Litigation or transactions with known phases but unpredictable intensity.

Is capped fees billing your best option? Ask yourself:

• Can we reasonably estimate the work, even if complexity varies?

• Does my client understand that cost has built- in flexibility?

• Are we prepared to manage margins if the cap is reached?

• Do we have reporting to track time against the cap?

Contingency Fees

Best for: Outcome-driven plaintiff matters

With contingency billing, the firm is paid only if the client wins or settles.

Pros

• No upfront cost for clients

• Strong alignment around results

• Potential for big payouts

Cons

• Significant financial risk for the firm

• Long delays before payment

• Not suitable for every practice area

This law billing model is risky for the firm, but nothing motivates results quite like it!

When it works best:
Personal injury, employment, and other results-based litigation.

Is contingent fee billing your best option? Ask yourself:

• Is the potential case outcome strong enough to justify the risk?

• Can the firm carry costs while waiting for resolution?

• Is success largely within the firm’s control?

• Does this practice area support outcome-based pricing?

Subscription Pricing (High-Level Overview)

Best for: Ongoing client relationships and recurring legal needs

Subscription pricing gives clients continuous access to legal services for a recurring fee. Startups, small businesses, and clients who value predictability are all-in on this model.

Pros

• Revenue becomes more predictable

• Encourages proactive legal support

• Strengthens long-term client loyalty

Cons

• Risk of scope creep without guardrails

• Not suited for highly variable or adversarial work

Is subscription pricing your best option? Questions to ask yourself:

• Does the client have ongoing, predictable legal needs?

• Can we clearly define what’s included—and what’s not?

• Do we have systems to track usage and profitability?

• Can the firm deliver consistent value month over month?

AI Is Enabling More Flexible Pricing

When tasks that used to take hours now take minutes, it naturally raises questions about billing. Clients notice. Firms do too. And that tension is actually a good thing. It’s pushing both sides to move past outdated pricing structures and have more honest conversations about value.

Legal AI tools don’t just make legal work faster, it makes billing fairer, pricing smarter, and firms better positioned to grow. These tools allow law firms to:

• Automatically capture time without manual timers

• Identify inefficiencies and scope creep

• Analyze historical matter data

• Align pricing with actual effort and outcomes

Track Time, Price Smarter

With Archie, firms see exactly how long work takes. Automatic time tracking captures every billable hour, helping firms adopt flexible billing models and price services confidently.

Learn more about Archie →

Choosing the Right Pricing Model

There’s no single “best” billing model. Most successful firms use a hybrid approach, matching pricing structures to matter type, risk level, and client expectations.

Billing models should balance client trust with firm sustainability. Legal pricing and modern billing models are no longer one-size-fits-all. Clients crave predictability, and technology finally makes it possible to deliver without cutting into your profits.

Firms that adapt accordingly won’t just bill differently, they’ll build stronger client relationships, boost cash flow, and operate with more clarity. With AI reshaping legal work, pricing strategies will evolve right alongside it.

‍